| Welcome to The Rejected Realms, NationStates' ejection-free zone! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you can only view some areas of the board and you can only post in the Troubleshooting and Suggestions forum. If you register an account, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customising your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Register now! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Explosive Remnants of War; by Separatist Peoples | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Feb 5 2016, 12:38 PM (117 Views) | |
| Libetarian Republics | Feb 5 2016, 12:38 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Spammer
|
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=363007 |
![]() |
|
| Christian Democrats | Feb 5 2016, 04:48 PM Post #2 |
|
HMSM James II
|
Against. I don't believe the establishment of an Explosive Remnants of War Action Subcommittee is necessary or desirable, and the choice of 99.7% clearance is entirely arbitrary. How safe would you feel living in an area that had been demined only 99.7% of the way? |
|
"I was born free and desire to continue so." | |
![]() |
|
| Ambrosia | Feb 5 2016, 06:27 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Lean Mean Raiding Machine
|
Substantially safer than an area that had been 0% demined, that's for damn sure. |
![]() |
|
| Zorgraff | Feb 5 2016, 09:42 PM Post #4 |
|
Poster
|
I am FOR this. It would really make places safer. And even if they were 99.7% secure, that is better than no security at all. |
![]() |
|
| berlitria | Feb 13 2016, 05:40 AM Post #5 |
|
Poster
|
I'm completely for this, thus being the safety of one's self and others. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Assembly · Next Topic » |






8:20 AM Jul 11