| Welcome to The Rejected Realms, NationStates' ejection-free zone! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you can only view some areas of the board and you can only post in the Troubleshooting and Suggestions forum. If you register an account, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customising your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Register now! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| To Prevent Dangerous Debris | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 13 2015, 04:08 PM (77 Views) | |
| 98X | Nov 13 2015, 04:08 PM Post #1 |
|
Poster
|
(I apologize in advance if I'm not supposed to start threads here. The following is the copy/paste of the resolution as submitted, followed by the 98X recommendation:) SEEKING to reestablish protected access to space for all nations, DISTRESSED by the rapidly increasing accumulation of frivolous repeals, RECOGNIZING that prolonged accumulation of debris in orbit can impede space travel and orbital operations, AWARE that one resolution cannot sufficiently legislate on all topics related to debris in space and choosing to address one aspect well, DEFINES debris as debris to quiet some illogical complaints, CONSIDERS an object to be in orbit if it circles a celestial body without propulsion and outside assistance (excepting gravity) at least once, INSTRUCTS member nations to have systems in place to certify the compliance of objects planned to be launched into orbit with the guidelines of this resolution, REQUIRES member nations to take all action necessary to prevent the launch of objects from their territory into orbit that have not been certified as compliant with this resolution, allowing exceptions only when loss of life would occur as a result of such actions, In order to reduce the quantity of potentially harmful debris in orbit, all objects launched into space must have the following abilities and are required to take the following actions: A- To Deorbit in one of the following fashions prior to becoming nonfunctional: 1- Complete deterioration into non damaging remains during descent and prior to collision, 2- Landing or collision in international waters, unclaimed undeveloped territory, or the territory of nations that consent to the collision or landing, 3- Entering into a junk orbit assigned by WASP, 4- Any method that removes the object from the vicinity of the body it previously orbited without harming other artificial objects in orbit, B- To Maneuver in order to avoid other objects in orbit to prevent damage of property, STATES that WASP will take into account the desires and needs of the relevant nations when assigning a junk orbit and will not contradict orbital classifications around a celestial body created by any entity representing, with consent of the governed, all nations on that body, CLARIFIES that this resolution will not impede or restrict the rights of nations to do battle in space so long as all damage done is part of a declared act of war against the owner of the object, the nation the object was launched from, or if the object services or benefits the enemy. 98X Has voted NO and encourages your NO vote. 98X Reasoning detailed on the NS WA GA forum: http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=26655065#p26655065 |
![]() |
|
| Guy | Nov 13 2015, 04:55 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Old Admin Slave
|
I appreciate it - I've had a pretty busy few days. Voted against, then. |
![]() |
|
| Evolu Tanis | Nov 13 2015, 04:56 PM Post #3 |
|
Epistemological Terrorist
|
The original never should have been repealed (both on the merits, and because the repeal argument itself... lacked truth and cohesion, to be polite about it). I urge a FOR vote. |
|
Here lies a toppled god. His fall was not a small one. We did but build his pedestal - A narrow and a tall one.
| |
![]() |
|
| Christian Democrats | Nov 14 2015, 04:34 AM Post #4 |
|
HMSM James II
|
Against. I don't like the attitude of the preambulatory clauses of this proposal. The author is trying to make the WA look stupid(er). |
|
"I was born free and desire to continue so." | |
![]() |
|
| Evolu Tanis | Nov 14 2015, 02:34 PM Post #5 |
|
Epistemological Terrorist
|
I would say the WA did that by itself; the author is merely failing to aggressively ignore it.
|
|
Here lies a toppled god. His fall was not a small one. We did but build his pedestal - A narrow and a tall one.
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Assembly · Next Topic » |





8:20 AM Jul 11