|
Wartime Looting and Pillage; Proposed by Separatist Peoples
|
|
Topic Started: Mar 1 2015, 09:22 PM (133 Views)
|
|
Christian Democrats
|
Mar 1 2015, 09:22 PM
Post #1
|
HMSM James II
- Posts:
- 3,245
- Group:
- Citizens
- Member
- #788
- Joined:
- April 22, 2011
- Nation name:
- James II
|
In-game debate thread: http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=318951
- Wartime Looting and Pillage
- Proposed by Separatist Peoples
Wartime Looting and Pillage Category: Human Rights Strength: Significant Proposed by: Separatist Peoples
Noting the necessity of military conflict and the violence and destruction that often follows;
Seeking to protect civilians who find themselves caught in a situation they aren’t responsible for, and;
Striving for a fair balance between strategic considerations and civilian lives;
The World Assembly establishes thusly:
Article I. Wartime Looting
1. Wartime looting shall be defined as the forceful seizure or theft of non-essential or humanitarian relief supplies by a military entity from civilian non-combatants within a theatre of combat operations during a time of armed conflict.
2. Wartime looting shall be determined by the nature of the goods being seized; seizure of essential supplies, such as food, water, or medical supplies not distributed as humanitarian aid, and material essential for immediate military operations, shall not be considered wartime looting, provided the owners are left sufficient supplies for their own needs.
3. Essential supplies seized from non-government entities by military forces shall be replaced or compensated for as soon as possible by the nation responsible for the seizure.
4. During conflict, member states shall specifically prohibit the seizure or damage of artistic or cultural treasures without explicit permission from the artefact's rightful governing authority, except for the purpose of temporarily securing them against damage or theft.
5. Member states are obliged to return secured artefacts to their rightful governing authority at the cessation of hostilities, and shall compensate owners for damages sustained in the interim.
6. Member states shall consider actions deliberately contrary to these provisions to be wartime looting, and therefore a war crime, and shall take all necessary steps to prevent it within their jurisdiction.
7. Member states shall consider command responsibility in the prosecution of wartime looting, and shall consider orders to the contrary of these provisions to be manifestly illegal. Member states shall ensure that subordinates can refuse such orders without fear of penalty.
Article II. Wartime Pillaging
1. Wartime pillage shall be defined as the intentional use of violence against civilians and their property by a military force, except where rendered, in the strictest sense, an absolute necessity by military strategy.
2. Member states' military forces are obliged to prevent unnecessary or disproportionate use of violence against civilians. Military forces may respond in self-defence with equivalent force to open aggression against them by civilians.
3. Member states' military forces are obliged to limit deliberate targeting of civilian property, except where such action is rendered an absolutely military necessity, and shall take all possible steps to protect civilian property from destruction in the territory they effectively control.
4. The use of violence against civilian persons or property for the purposes of coercion or reprisal shall never be considered a military necessity by member states.
5. Member states shall consider actions deliberately contrary to these provisions to be wartime pillaging, and therefore a war crime, and shall take all necessary steps to prevent it within their jurisdiction.
6. Member states shall consider command responsibility in the prosecution of wartime pillaging, and shall consider orders to the contrary of these provisions to be manifestly illegal. Member states shall ensure that subordinates can refuse such orders without fear of penalty.
|
"I was born free and desire to continue so."
|
| |
|
Christian Democrats
|
Mar 1 2015, 09:23 PM
Post #2
|
HMSM James II
- Posts:
- 3,245
- Group:
- Citizens
- Member
- #788
- Joined:
- April 22, 2011
- Nation name:
- James II
|
- Christian Democrats
- Mar 1 2015, 09:22 PM
3. Essential supplies seized from non-government entities by military forces shall be replaced or compensated for as soon as possible by the nation responsible for the seizure. Really? Terrorist organizations are "non-government entities."
Against.
|
"I was born free and desire to continue so."
|
| |
|
Gruenberg
|
Mar 1 2015, 09:54 PM
Post #3
|
Dedicated
- Posts:
- 270
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #254
- Joined:
- November 28, 2005
|
(Not voting.)
Obviously in favour. I do feel sorry for SP, though; his drafting threads are painful.
|
|
|
| |
|
Kenny
|
Mar 1 2015, 10:21 PM
Post #4
|
WASC Suicide Bomber
- Posts:
- 113
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #439
- Joined:
- August 17, 2007
- Nation name:
- Omigodtheyclonedkenny
|
Is Delegate's Prerogative an option? I'm fine with whichever way the Delegate decides to vote.
|
|
About us
|
| |
|
Libetarian Republics
|
Mar 2 2015, 12:21 AM
Post #5
|
Spammer
- Posts:
- 4,744
- Group:
- Former Delegate
- Member
- #1,019
- Joined:
- November 19, 2012
- Nation name:
- Libetaran Republics
|
Yup and I think we even have the option to have the Delegate abstain from voting entirely, although this occurs in SC more often than not.
|
|
|
| |
|
unibot
|
Mar 2 2015, 12:41 AM
Post #6
|
Chief Propagandist
- Posts:
- 4,205
- Group:
- Former Delegate
- Member
- #650
- Joined:
- December 19, 2009
|
I voted early because I liked the draft and I didn't like how Euro voted against right off the bat for the silliest of reasons.
|
 Former Delegate of The Rejected Realms Former Editor-In-Chief, Maestro
|
| |
|
Gruenberg
|
Mar 2 2015, 07:24 AM
Post #7
|
Dedicated
- Posts:
- 270
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #254
- Joined:
- November 28, 2005
|
What was their reason?
|
|
|
| |
|
Banned: Chester Pearson
|
Mar 2 2015, 10:49 PM
Post #8
|
Resouluton Author Extraordinaire
- Posts:
- 130
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #1,140
- Joined:
- September 28, 2013
- Nation name:
- The UFoC Mission to The Rejected Realms
|
- Christian Democrats
- Mar 1 2015, 09:23 PM
- Christian Democrats
- Mar 1 2015, 09:22 PM
3. Essential supplies seized from non-government entities by military forces shall be replaced or compensated for as soon as possible by the nation responsible for the seizure.
Really? Terrorist organizations are "non-government entities." Against. On the grounds that CD is being a huge dick, I vote FOR. Plus I like SP, and he always drafts decent legislation.
|
The Right Honourable Chester B. Pearson,
Prime Minister, United Federation of Canada
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|