| Dobrodoli na forum Meduslovjanskogo jezyka! elajemo vam mnogo prijemnosti. Добродошли на форум Меджусловјанского језыка! Желајемо вам много пријемности. Welcome to Interslavic! We hope you enjoy your visit. Sejčas pogledajete nae forum kako gosť. To znači, e imajete ograničeny dostup do někojih česti forum i ne moete koristati vse funkcije. Ako li pristupite v nau grupu, budete imati svobodny dostup do sekcij preznačenyh jedino za členov, na pr. zaloeňje profila, izsylaňje privatnyh poslaň i učestničstvo v glasovaňjah. Zapisaňje se jest prosto, bystro i vpolno bezplatno. Сејчас погледајете наше форум како гость. То значи, же имајете ограничены доступ до некојих чести форум и не можете користати все функције. Ако ли приступите в нашу групу, будете имати свободны доступ до секциј презначеных једино за членов, на пр. заложеньје профила, изсыланьје приватных послань и учестничство в гласованьјах. Записаньје се јест просто, быстро и вполно безплатно. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Pristupite v nau grupu! Приступите в нашу групу! Join our community! Ako li u jeste člen, prijavite se, e byste mogli koristati vse monosti: Ако ли уж јесте член, пријавите се, же бысте могли користати все можности: If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| j/'; The use of i, j or ' after consonants | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 18 2008, 01:33 PM (4,112 Views) | |
| iopq | Aug 26 2008, 08:34 AM Post #31 |
|
Administrator
|
n is softenable because every Slavic language has n' p is not because it exists in Polish and Russian - 2 votes поет means sings, поэт means poet |
|
Bo v c'omu žytti pomiž baletom i svobodoju zavždy potribno vybyraty svobodu, navit' jakščo ce čehoslovac'kyj general. Sergij Žadan "Anarchy in the Ukr" | |
![]() |
|
| IJzeren Jan | Aug 26 2008, 08:51 AM Post #32 |
|
Jan van Steenbergen
|
Hehe, agreed!
Like I said, -jov is a perfectly normal sequence in Polish. Besides, in many transcription of Russian a name like "Kovalev" comes out like "Kovaljov". I'm sure Mr. Kovalev would recognise his own name when it's written like that! In any case, -jov is undoubtedly more understandable for a Russian than -ej or something similar for a Pole. Besides, -ov is handy as a universal genitive plural for masculine nouns. Making all kinds of exception would make Slovianski an utter failure as an auxlang. At least, if we take the whole thing seriously.
Yet, it is perfectly understandable to anybody. I know it is ugly, and I know it is uncommon. If anyone can think of a good reason to get rid of it, be my guest! But all the alternatives I've seen make things only much, much worse. Besides, there is also йо to consider. Jan |
|
Človeku, ktoromu je trudno s soboju samim, verojetno to bude trudno s vsim inim. Slovianski - Словянски - Словјански [čćч] | |
![]() |
|
| IJzeren Jan | Aug 26 2008, 08:56 AM Post #33 |
|
Jan van Steenbergen
|
So? Apart from a few cases, like the diabel mentioned above, that point is completely moot. I don't think we should tell people how exactly to pronounce Slovianski.
I know, but what does that have to do with softening? Jan |
|
Človeku, ktoromu je trudno s soboju samim, verojetno to bude trudno s vsim inim. Slovianski - Словянски - Словјански [čćч] | |
![]() |
|
| iopq | Aug 26 2008, 10:40 AM Post #34 |
|
Administrator
|
first of all, jokanje in Russian is a far newer feature so sure, in Kovalev it turns into jo, but in Gusev it doesn't don't you think that's kind of arbitrary to base a DECLENSION TABLE on some random Russian rule that has nothing to do with it? It's kind of how Gabriel wanted to have mjod because of Russian and Polish forms of course, the correct Slovianski form is med because Slovianski doesn't have jokanje or the Polish vowel change just because some later change on the e made it jo doesn't mean we can base the declension table on it, but rather we can use the familiar -i that Poles use and have hoteli/kroli my point about poet is that in Russian there is a difference and there is a point to having e/je distinciton |
|
Bo v c'omu žytti pomiž baletom i svobodoju zavždy potribno vybyraty svobodu, navit' jakščo ce čehoslovac'kyj general. Sergij Žadan "Anarchy in the Ukr" | |
![]() |
|
| IJzeren Jan | Aug 26 2008, 01:22 PM Post #35 |
|
Jan van Steenbergen
|
Of course not! It's based on the fact that I don't want to have 56 different declension tables in Slovianski. When I started Slovianski-N, I simply tried to create one table for each gender. That worked for M and N, but not for F, and so there had to be a fourth table, because ena and jednost' really wouldn't fit into one declension. For the M.gen.pl., I picked -ov because that ending is omnipresent. It doesn't matter that the languages also have other forms (-ev, -ej, -i, -u and whathaveyou), because they all have the ending -ov. So no, I didn't pick -jov because of Russian -jv, I picked it because it was the most obvious form for this case. The jo > je change has nothing to do with declension, it is a phonological process. In my opinion, we shouldn't have too many of that kind of processes in Slovianski, because it makes it hopelessly more complicated than necessary. NB Russian je comes in this case from Early Common Slavic jo!
Obviously. Mjod/mid is an entirely different case. In Polish it has o because the word ends in a hard dental consonant (and the is because the d is voiced).
Ah, I see. Well, I agree with that. I'd rather just learn to live with йе. Jan |
|
Človeku, ktoromu je trudno s soboju samim, verojetno to bude trudno s vsim inim. Slovianski - Словянски - Словјански [čćч] | |
![]() |
|
| iopq | Aug 26 2008, 03:39 PM Post #36 |
|
Administrator
|
I mean we might as well not have the o~e rule for declension and replace it all with -o. We can pull it off if we use -uv instead of -ov in words like pl'uvat'. Again, something interesting to discuss. I think we can get away with that, but then it would be easier to use the Serbo-Slovianski Cyrillic for writing forms like дньов which would be easier on the eyes than днйов neither is attested, but дньов seems like a better extension of the word *дьнь since there was never at any point a й in that word, and I've been using it for a while so of course I'm biased |
|
Bo v c'omu žytti pomiž baletom i svobodoju zavždy potribno vybyraty svobodu, navit' jakščo ce čehoslovac'kyj general. Sergij Žadan "Anarchy in the Ukr" | |
![]() |
|
| IJzeren Jan | Aug 26 2008, 05:20 PM Post #37 |
|
Jan van Steenbergen
|
Fully agreed! Things like the o~e rule may be naturalistic, but they also make Slovianski way to complicated for a simplified language! I'd like to make one exception, though. The neuter possessive pronouns should keep the e, because "mojo" etc. really look bad.
Again, fully agreed. As I explained in another message, ь and й are essentially the same letter. The former used after a consonant, the latter after a vowel or word-finally. Well, maybe not precisely the same letter, but fully complementary. Jan |
|
Človeku, ktoromu je trudno s soboju samim, verojetno to bude trudno s vsim inim. Slovianski - Словянски - Словјански [čćч] | |
![]() |
|
| iopq | Aug 27 2008, 02:56 AM Post #38 |
|
Administrator
|
mojo looks fine for a Ukrainian speaker ![]() I would say morje/lice/other neuter nouns should be the exception |
|
Bo v c'omu žytti pomiž baletom i svobodoju zavždy potribno vybyraty svobodu, navit' jakščo ce čehoslovac'kyj general. Sergij Žadan "Anarchy in the Ukr" | |
![]() |
|
| iopq | Aug 27 2008, 07:03 AM Post #39 |
|
Administrator
|
what about two words connected like so: паровоз in Russian there are some irregularities because it's hard to tell whether to use o or e as a connecting vowel коневал but конокрад we should decide whether: 1. We should use this construction 2. We want to use e or o this is related to the o~e discussion somewhat because of words like krajeugolni if we choose to use o it will yield results like krajougolni |
|
Bo v c'omu žytti pomiž baletom i svobodoju zavždy potribno vybyraty svobodu, navit' jakščo ce čehoslovac'kyj general. Sergij Žadan "Anarchy in the Ukr" | |
![]() |
|
| IJzeren Jan | Aug 27 2008, 07:27 AM Post #40 |
|
Jan van Steenbergen
|
Yes, they should be the exception. But that's not a big problem; we know already, that neuter nouns can end on -o or -(j)e and belong to one declension anyway. |
|
Človeku, ktoromu je trudno s soboju samim, verojetno to bude trudno s vsim inim. Slovianski - Словянски - Словјански [čćч] | |
![]() |
|
| IJzeren Jan | Aug 27 2008, 07:30 AM Post #41 |
|
Jan van Steenbergen
|
Good point. Well, Polish always has -o- in these cases AFAIK, so I'd say Slovianski can follow its example. Nice and simple. Jan |
|
Človeku, ktoromu je trudno s soboju samim, verojetno to bude trudno s vsim inim. Slovianski - Словянски - Словјански [čćч] | |
![]() |
|
| Gabriel Svoboda | Aug 27 2008, 11:36 AM Post #42 |
|
Well, at first Jan said we shouldn't have rules like under phonological condition X sound Y should become Z. So it seems you agreed on abolishing it. Great. But now you are trying to reinvent the rule by discussing exceptions. The result is even more difficult than the original rule abolished: under phonological condition A and under grammatical condition B sound C should become D. |
![]() |
|
| Gabriel Svoboda | Aug 27 2008, 11:52 AM Post #43 |
|
So, as far as I understand it, you want to: 1) say that the passive suffix should be -jen- instead of -en- 2) bj > bl', pj > pl', vj > vl', mj > ml' That's not my cup of west Slavic tea, but I could live with it (providing we also keep 'o>e to have a consistent level of complexity :-) ). |
![]() |
|
| iopq | Aug 27 2008, 01:13 PM Post #44 |
|
Administrator
|
it's not -jen- prigotovi + -en = prigotovjen -> prigotovl'en i sometimes gets contracted to a j in these cases same way prosi + -en = prosjen -> prošen but if it doesn't end in i then a verb like klot' would use the base form kol- (because the reason it's klot' is because of the open syllable rule because a thousand years ago nobody could pronounce kolti) kol + -en = kolen |
|
Bo v c'omu žytti pomiž baletom i svobodoju zavždy potribno vybyraty svobodu, navit' jakščo ce čehoslovac'kyj general. Sergij Žadan "Anarchy in the Ukr" | |
![]() |
|
| IJzeren Jan | Aug 27 2008, 01:36 PM Post #45 |
|
Jan van Steenbergen
|
So, as far as I understand it, you want to: 1) say that the passive suffix should be -jen- instead of -en- 2) bj > bl', pj > pl', vj > vl', mj > ml'[/quote] Eh? Why on earth would anybody want to add a j in these cases? I agree that in the case of i-stems something had to be done to allow for "blienje" and "proenje" instead of "prosijenje" and "blizijenje", but if we start adding a j as a rule, we'll end up with "hvaljeni", "govorjeni", "nesjeni", "vedjeni" etc. Hardly an improvement! As for pj > plj... Indeed, I'm not in favour of this kind of mechanisms. Besides, in cases of doubt I'd say we should go for the easiest solution, which by all standards is pj. (Besides... "pljat'" for 5???) Jan |
|
Človeku, ktoromu je trudno s soboju samim, verojetno to bude trudno s vsim inim. Slovianski - Словянски - Словјански [čćч] | |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Fonologija i pravopis · Next Topic » |







2:15 PM Jul 11