| Welcome to Exterminatus Now. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Britan's UFOs; Is this guy for real? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 13 2010, 05:58 PM (585 Views) | |
| flyboy254 | May 17 2010, 05:40 AM Post #26 |
![]()
Hunter: The only thing standing between us and the monsters
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And to add to the weird stuff, this article from the Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...+In+the+News%29 Real quick is this paper better or worse than the Daily Mail? |
![]() |
|
| Hercule Pyro | May 17 2010, 07:11 AM Post #27 |
|
You've done some terrible things, Mister Harry
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Better. Basically? If it's in the Mail or Daily Express, disregard. If it's in The Sun, Star, or Mirror, if it's related to popular culture (Like Doctor Who) it might be worth it but honestly, why are you reading them. If it's in the Guardian, Telegraph, Times or Independent, it may have a grain of truth in, possibly, if you squint. I'm not a huge fan of print journalism. |
![]() |
|
| Sabre_Justice | May 17 2010, 08:04 AM Post #28 |
|
Ask me about very angry cats
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The online version isn't that much better, honestly, but at least since they all report on the same things using each other as sources you get some variety. |
![]() |
|
| Calbeck | May 20 2010, 09:33 AM Post #29 |
|
I got a lock on 'im...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You mean "dead-tree infotainment"? Srsly, they might as well save a few larches and put it entirely online, more folks read it there anyways. |
![]() |
|
| Pixellated | May 20 2010, 10:24 AM Post #30 |
![]()
Being responsible
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I had to do a case study on the differences between the Guardian's print and web versions, and they're still doing very well in print, especially compared to other papers. I put it down to its design. |
![]() |
|
| Calbeck | May 21 2010, 08:47 AM Post #31 |
|
I got a lock on 'im...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's genuinely surprising, knowing how poorly almost all other papers are doing. |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · The CABAL Network · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)




2:50 PM Jul 11