| Welcome to Campfire Soapbox. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Conservatives & Liberals; What do you think describes each? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 26 2004, 05:06 PM (506 Views) | |
| teryt | Oct 26 2004, 05:06 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Missing in Action Member
|
Thought this might be interesting to see what yall think are words that describe Conservatives & Liberals. (and Chris, please don't take the high road & say "People"). I'll start with a few: CONSERVATIVES: Stupid Heartless greedy backward self-righteous bigots old stagnant for big biz homophobes narrow-minded war hawks wants pollution small government LIBERALS: Stupid emotional socialist/communistic young for the worker unpatriotic weak tree hugging fanatics tax & spend big government progressive My point is to show what silly stereotypes these are! BTW: Why aren't there any stereotypes for Libertarians? |
My Boast is Christ ![]() Soon to have MBA (I'll perhaps be smart then) Recovering Perfectionist Christian Hedonist | |
![]() |
|
| brewster | Oct 26 2004, 05:10 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Winemaker Extraordinaire
|
LIBERTARIANS: Idealistic Unrealistic Irrelevant Out of Power Sorry, Chris!
|
My Favourite CampsiteBow Valley Provincial Park, Kananaskis Country, Alberta | |
![]() |
|
| jrf | Oct 26 2004, 05:44 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Member
|
Conservatives robber barons all for one Liberals Robin Hoods one for all |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Oct 26 2004, 07:44 PM Post #4 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Libertarians never had power, Bruce, unless you consider their claim to the classical liberalism that founded this nation. But you're right, I am idealistic and/or unrealistic in my convictions and principles. And I like to hold the feet of BSers to the fire. I listened some to Badnarik speaking to some college kids today. He is much more realistic. More practical. But at the national level largely irrelevant. Yet passionate in his convictions and principles. Oh, conservative, liberal, as Joel points out (or I interpret), all for one and one for all we are all in this together and had better get it together. Conservative or liberal I care not long as you show conviction and principle. Rep and Dem PPPs, however, suck big time. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| MDPD6320 | Oct 26 2004, 08:24 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Frank - Gainesville, Florida
|
What would we do without labels? I could easily describe myself as a Jeffersonian Liberal, but few would understand my position and beliefs if I did. In order to be more in keeping with popular descriptions I say: Conservative: Smaller, weaker Federal government Balanced budgets Strong military Strict interpretation of the Constitution Motto might be "Government that governs least governs best" Liberal: Strong central government Social engineering by laws Redistrabution of waelth via taxation Believes Constitution is a "living document" Motto might be "We can do it better for you" However, I will bet the attributes you list can be applied to both. Frank |
|
" The government big enough to give you everything you want it is big enough to take everything you have." "Extremism in the pursuit of liberty is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue" All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. | |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Oct 26 2004, 08:48 PM Post #6 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Frank, I have refered to myself as a Madisonian liberal with the same lack of understanding. Populist definitions of conservativsm and liberalism are BS. Though I chuckle at how well the populist liberal definition you give fits the populist liberal Bush, and Kerry, of course, as well. I balk however at the notion that your definitions would make he who said this a liberal Liberty must be limited in order to be possessed. --Edmund Burke "Government that governs least governs best" One of my favorites, too. But who first said it? The Federalist advocate of a strong central government Jefferson? Or that areligious rabble rouser Thomas Paine? Or the political minimalist Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience,
|
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| MDPD6320 | Oct 26 2004, 10:17 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Frank - Gainesville, Florida
|
Chris, A great line by Thoreau, but I have to tell you Paine is the ultimate rabble rouser, IMHO. Frank |
|
" The government big enough to give you everything you want it is big enough to take everything you have." "Extremism in the pursuit of liberty is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue" All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. | |
![]() |
|
| pentax | Oct 26 2004, 10:18 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Kamloops - BC Interior
|
teryt - a couple years ago, a hard-right American aquaintance surmised that in America, I would be somewhat of a Libertarian. Have little knowledge, I went to their web-site, and from there (forgotten just exactly how) to a Forum for Libertarians. I liked quite a few of the concepts they hold, but the peoples societal opinions seemed to be way too much "F you guys - I'm doing alright.". I suspect that in their versions of America, the poor and downtrodden could just bloody-well fend for themselves. Unfortunately when people get far enough down, they tend to get truly desperate, even to violence on an everyday scale. I dont know how many saw an early '70's Charleton Heston movie called "The Omega Man" about ONE healthy man, barricaded in a penthouse with an arsenal of weapons and gadgets against the disease and anarchy in his city outside - but thats not the way I would like to live...... |
![]() (thumbnail) ![]() "Kirk to Enterprise - Very funny, Scotty.... now beam down my clothes!" | |
![]() |
|
| teryt | Oct 27 2004, 12:23 AM Post #9 |
![]()
Missing in Action Member
|
Thought of a couple more while driving. LIBERALS Whinners Babies Amoral anti-military CONSERVATIVES Against middle class facists pigs establishment (does anyone use that any more?) heartless fortunate sons Well I for one, speaking as a conservative, am not like all these things listed here in that category. How about some of the more liberal folks here - are you guys anything like what is stated here about you? |
My Boast is Christ ![]() Soon to have MBA (I'll perhaps be smart then) Recovering Perfectionist Christian Hedonist | |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Oct 27 2004, 05:12 AM Post #10 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Murray, to a degree your perception of some Libertarians is true. Personally I would state my stance on such issues as if you choose not to contribute or produce, then you deserve exactly what you choose. Frank, your right on that, Thoreau spark civil disobedience, Paine a revolution. Tery, each one of the populist definitions of con and lib you and others propose are simply epithets that can be tossed either way. None of them have anything to do with principles. It's the same thing with this election slinging mud to avoid principled discussion of issues. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| Colo_Crawdad | Oct 27 2004, 06:31 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Lowell
|
Throw in the social conservatives that are supporting Constitutional Amendments to limit Freedom of Speech (flag burning), control lifestyles (gay marriage ban), limit personal privacy (ban abortion) and countless other incursions of the Federal government into people's personal lives and it sure plays havoc with those definitions, doesn't it? |
| "WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US." --- Pogo | |
![]() |
|
| DanielDenali | Oct 27 2004, 10:13 AM Post #12 |
|
Member
|
Who made this list? |
![]() |
|
| teryt | Oct 27 2004, 05:03 PM Post #13 |
![]()
Missing in Action Member
|
Well sure. I thought looking at these common labels might show how absurd the ideas are. CONSERVATIVES Baby killers (war) LIBERALS Murderers (abortion) |
My Boast is Christ ![]() Soon to have MBA (I'll perhaps be smart then) Recovering Perfectionist Christian Hedonist | |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Oct 27 2004, 06:47 PM Post #14 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
But if dual-use why associate at all? Why not just examine epithets hurled? Less inciteful, more insightful. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| teryt | Oct 27 2004, 08:29 PM Post #15 |
![]()
Missing in Action Member
|
I've heard a few of these stereotypes on here. |
My Boast is Christ ![]() Soon to have MBA (I'll perhaps be smart then) Recovering Perfectionist Christian Hedonist | |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Soapbox · Next Topic » |









My Favourite Campsite






2:19 AM Jul 11