| Welcome to Campfire Soapbox. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Fingers In The Pie - Republican Earmarking | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 25 2006, 01:00 PM (137 Views) | |
| ngc1514 | Jun 25 2006, 01:00 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Member
|
From today's New York Times: Editorial The Speaker's Hard Lesson in Reform Published: June 25, 2006 Dennis Hastert, the speaker of the House, promised credible reform back when the stench of illegal quid pro quo dealings between lobbyists and ethically challenged lawmakers seized public attention. But nothing close to true self-policing is emerging from Congress. And now Mr. Hastert is the latest lawmaker in the limelight for the rampant pork-barrel practice of earmarking — the swift, debate-free inclusion in mass appropriations bills of small fortunes in government favors for special pleaders. In the speaker's case, his $200 million earmark to advance a road project known as Prairie Parkway back home in Illinois became an acute embarrassment after local news media and critics discovered Mr. Hastert netted a fast $2 million profit from dealing in land situated several miles from the proposed roadway. Mr. Hastert's office insists that he had long supported the road plan in the booming region and that the land parcel was far enough removed. He contends, in short, that there was nothing improper in his purchase being made, in partnership with the local Republican county leader, just a year before he arranged the earmark. That's for voters to judge. But we can hope Mr. Hastert would see, at least in hindsight, the cloud that this activity has cast over Congress, which slipped 13,012 earmarks to passage this year worth $67 billion. That's a tripling of the pork trough since the Republicans won control of the House in 1994. Sometimes it seems as if earmarking is all this Congress knows how to do. Members have spent so few calendar days in Washington that they hark back to the "do-nothing" Congress excoriated six decades ago by President Harry Truman. Doing nothing can be the lesser of two evils, however. That seems to be true of the farce of an ethics reform bill now being fumbled around by the House and Senate. The measure offers no hope for a true earmark crackdown and totally avoids the core Capitol scandal — the lobbying industry's freedom to woo grateful lawmakers with bundles of corporate campaign contributions. Congress's unwillingness to police its behavior was clear months ago when lawmakers rejected creation of an independent office of public integrity that might actually enforce the sorts of promises so easily made by Speaker Hastert. |
Eric
| |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Jun 25 2006, 03:43 PM Post #2 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Republicans of 1994 took the House largely with promises laid out in Contract with America to fight and reform Democrat corruption. Seems we've come full circle. Power corrupts. When will we learn. Term limits! |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| ngc1514 | Jun 25 2006, 05:14 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Member
|
We seem to agree on many things, Chris, but not term limits. I don't think people should be denied the opportunity to vote for whomever they wish... including the president. |
Eric
| |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Jun 25 2006, 07:51 PM Post #4 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Well, I can't argue with that, people should be free to elect whomever they want. Maybe people get lazy though, voting for the familiar face, or the one that brings the most pork home. Terms limits is attractive because it keeps the professional politician out of government. IT's the professionals who to gain and keep power seem to be corrupted by it. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Jun 25 2006, 08:36 PM Post #5 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Some harsh but fitting criticism: Well-paved road to political perdition
|
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| ngc1514 | Jun 26 2006, 05:51 AM Post #6 |
![]()
Member
|
No doubt, but the solution is something to kick the voter out of voter apathy and not term limits. I expect many of the threads here address the same problem under different guises: Dumbing Down of America, Ann Coulter and others. The first step is doing away with the whole primary system. I think this is worth its own thread and I'll start it. |
Eric
| |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Soapbox · Next Topic » |








1:27 PM Jul 11