| Welcome to Campfire Soapbox. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Islam And The West | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 7 2006, 08:59 AM (164 Views) | |
| cmoehle | Jun 7 2006, 08:59 AM Post #1 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Bernard Lewis "is one of the most widely read scholars of the Middle East, whose advice is frequently sought by policymakers. The Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing has written that, over a 60-year career, he has emerged as "the most influential postwar historian of Islam and the Middle East." In Islam and the West: A Conversation with Bernard Lewis he provides a couple points into understanding this topic that I think are insightful and should inform any discussion of Islam or, for that matter, Christianity. I'll try to focus in on the two points, but first an introduction:
Point one, Christendom and Islamdom:
Point two, church and state:
|
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| Lon Frank | Jun 7 2006, 12:54 PM Post #2 |
|
Member
|
Chris, this was a good article, but I'm afraid he was talking over my head most of the time. The one thing I got, I already knew in a way: "They think, rather, of a religion subdivided into nations...." I tend to think of the Islam world as a big tar baby. There may be many nations, but should you poke your finger into one, you are mired in all the rest as well. (Afganistan...Iraq...Iran...) Even though, if Iraq (big big 'if') should become a mini America with democracy, liberty and justice for all, they would still be an Islamic nation, with an inherently Islamic government, based on Islamic principals. We, on the other hand, are irretrievably tied to Israel, and we are both simply 'infidels' in Islamic theology. So, to tie this to the other thread, where we are offering to help Iran with nukes and their 'aging' air force, is it really plausible to expect an Islamic ally? Will a newly Americanized Iraq, for example, help us in the face of a future threat from Iran? Did the Saudis help us post 9/11, or did they just cash our checks (praise Allah) and retire aboard their yachts? Which all boils down to the primary question: are we in the Mideast to make friends and influence the introduction of democracy, or are we there for short-term oil profits, and screw the future? I would love to think that our help and example is the cure-all for the Mideast and it's centuries-long religious wars, but sometimes I'm so cynical I depress myself. For instance, if we truly want to help Iran, and alleviate their 'need' for nuke weapons, why not give them tractor parts, instead of airplane parts? Geeze, am I the only one who sees this? |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Jun 7 2006, 01:27 PM Post #3 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
I think the other important point was the disction between a religion and a civilization or culture "independent of religious belief". The spread of Islam is more one of civilization or culture. So it's not a nation we're fighting, as you know. And it's not a religion we're fighting. So whether we're helping or fighting, we need to know the enemy. Islamic fundamentalism comes from Islamdom as Hitler came from Christendom. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| DocInBird | Jun 7 2006, 02:07 PM Post #4 |
|
Member
|
So, it is not a nation that we are fighting. Did I read that correctly? We are fighting selected citizens of that nation. So, when we drop bombs on neiborhoods, the children that we kill are Islamic activists? How does this work, exactly? These are "smart bombs", right? How do they know which children to kill? Yes, I am being ugly. The whole situation is ugly. Some smug moron sits in his office and decides to bomb children. How would you expect me to react? |
|
--doc Just Doc and Orson (German Shepherd) wandering around North America. | |
![]() |
|
| DocInBird | Jun 7 2006, 05:13 PM Post #5 |
|
Member
|
Sorry. My previous posting was inappropriate and in poor taste. |
|
--doc Just Doc and Orson (German Shepherd) wandering around North America. | |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Jun 7 2006, 06:52 PM Post #6 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Emotional, but we do have to fight terrorism. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| Lon Frank | Jun 7 2006, 08:28 PM Post #7 |
|
Member
|
I don't think your post was inappropriate at all, Doc. You usually have the knack to cut to the bone of discussion, and I see this the same. Like Cris, I would hope we are fighting terrorism, but being my cynical, doubting, self, I often imagine we are just playing politics on a global board with expendable children (theirs and ours) as the pawns. Did we fight terrorism is Afganistan, or did we simply make the drug lords and their terrorist friends richer and more powerful? Did we fight terrorism in Iraq, or did we just decide they needed a McDonalds lifestyle, and an oil trading partner? Are we doing anything about the genocide in Darfur; the diamond mining in Africa, which is often so berift of human rights as to be slavery or worse? It seems that our terrorists must be in a country that we have a financial interest in, and not be supported by international big business. I forget who, but there is a famous person, a writer perhaps, who has a legacy award, and contends that the end of human morals was when airplanes dropped the first bombs. |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Jun 7 2006, 08:49 PM Post #8 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
I don't think it's possible to eliminate politics or, worse, personalities, only minimize their influence with better understanding. The picture painted of Islam by politicians and pundits laacks the insight someone like Lewis offers, some perhaps obvious, some not. I think it import not to apologize for Islam, but to know the enemy we do fight, as Sun Tzu long ago advised, and to disguish that enemy from people like you and I whom we do not fight but need to fight together with to defeat terrorism. Lack of understanding has the same demoralizing effect as airplanes dropping bombs. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| tomdrobin | Jun 7 2006, 09:18 PM Post #9 |
|
Member
|
Disagree! Islamic Fundamentalism is driven by religion, or at least a perverse interpretation of it, and fueled by frustration and disatisfaction of outcomes. Hitler's conquest were primarily just that. An attempt at empire building. Religion was not the motivator, although it was occassional used as justification for acts that had economic and social motives (ie; the holocaust). |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Jun 8 2006, 04:08 AM Post #10 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Your argument, Tom, paints them the same. Recall that Germany has lost WWI and was impoverished at the time Hitler came along. Hitler based his ideas in Christianity, er, Christendom, distorting those ideas most Christians argue. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| pentax | Jun 8 2006, 04:27 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Kamloops - BC Interior
|
Nothing more than a cloak, sufficient to be in a StarTrek movie about Klingons. (sarcasm intentional) |
![]() (thumbnail) ![]() "Kirk to Enterprise - Very funny, Scotty.... now beam down my clothes!" | |
![]() |
|
| pentax | Jun 8 2006, 04:33 AM Post #12 |
![]()
Kamloops - BC Interior
|
I'm not so sure about that, Doc..... tragically sad, yes. Would I like to deal with it and my kids, or someone I know? Damn, NO. But is there a better way, technologically? War sucks - there's just no getting around it. It just sucks..... |
![]() (thumbnail) ![]() "Kirk to Enterprise - Very funny, Scotty.... now beam down my clothes!" | |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | Jun 8 2006, 05:43 AM Post #13 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
But Hitler was sincere in Mein Kampf about these things, just as Southern Baptists were in their biblical justification of slavery or the Westboro Baptists demonstrating at military funeral against gay tolerance. All that can be dismissed as lunacy, but some people believe that crap. It is the stuff of populism. It's brought about wars in the past and will again in the future. That is the important of the Lewis talk about the West and Islam, to gain some insight into what we're dealing with, who the real lunatic enemy is, separate from the ordinary family that just wants to grow some crops or run a little shop. War is hell. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| bikemanb | Jun 8 2006, 06:47 AM Post #14 |
|
Liberal Conservative
|
I think the largest disconnect is the difference in the view, which is extremely difficult to understand for us, is the state/religion view most in the "West" hold as compared to the religion/state view that most Islamics seem to express. |
|
Bill, Rita and Chloe the Terror Cat For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise. Benjamin Franklin | |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Soapbox · Next Topic » |










1:02 PM Jul 11