| Welcome to Campfire Soapbox. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Finally Getting Some Border Fences!; I guess congress feels the public's pain | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 17 2006, 01:53 PM (572 Views) | |
| teryt | May 27 2006, 01:00 PM Post #31 |
![]()
Missing in Action Member
|
Populist or not, I think it's a good idea. Just makes good business sense to me too - if you had someone breaking into your house, what would you do? Perhaps we should annex their house! LOL (think about that in business merger terms) |
My Boast is Christ ![]() Soon to have MBA (I'll perhaps be smart then) Recovering Perfectionist Christian Hedonist | |
![]() |
|
| TexasShadow | May 27 2006, 01:23 PM Post #32 |
![]()
Jane
|
well, the fence could end up more trouble than it's worth if the mexicans make it an act of war and knock it down or drive a truck through it, etc. but, if they don't do that, then it will divert immigrants to different points of entry, which, in theory, should make it easier to catch them. but the real problem is what to do with them when you catch them. putting them back across the border a couple miles from their entry point is stupid. they just get a good nights sleep and do it again the next day. and, it appears that the courts aren't prosecuting the smugglers, just letting them go, so the border patrolmen naturally feel like they're wasting their time and energy chasing and catching anyone. in the fifties, we did an airlift, flying them down to the guatemalan border to release them, but I'd bet lots of $$ that Fox won't allow that. He wants them to come up here, earn $$ and send it back home. |
|
| |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | May 27 2006, 02:16 PM Post #33 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
Who is breaking into my house? Why all the rhetoric? It doesn't solve problems. |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| TexasShadow | May 27 2006, 02:55 PM Post #34 |
![]()
Jane
|
chris, just because no one is breaking into YOUR house doesn't mean it isn't happening to your fellow americans. and it is happening, everyday. my uncle has to use log chains on his icebox and pantry to keep them from stealing and making a mess in his ranchhouse kitchen. he doesn't bother to lock the doors on the place anymore, because they just break a window and go in anyway. they cut fences and nothing makes a rancher madder than having to go sort out his cattle from the neighbor's herd. |
|
| |
![]() |
|
| cmoehle | May 27 2006, 03:27 PM Post #35 |
|
Chris - San Antonio TX
|
And just because it is happening in this or that instance doesn't mean it is pervasive, no? |
|
Politics is the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. --Barry Goldwater | |
![]() |
|
| TexasShadow | May 27 2006, 03:47 PM Post #36 |
![]()
Jane
|
no, but my uncle isn't the only one. just ask any rancher whose place is within 50 miles of the border from here to CA and see what answer you get. you know (or maybe you don't) how protective texas ranchers are about their ranches, not liking any intrusions at all, but they let the border patrol go in and make roads so they could patrol...what does that tell you? |
|
| |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Soapbox · Next Topic » |









1:03 PM Jul 11