| Welcome to Bronze Age Center. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| wilusa | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 11 2015, 01:41 AM (310 Views) | |
| George Nicolaides | May 11 2015, 01:41 AM Post #1 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It has currently been taken as proven in the latest literature that Wilusa = Wilios = Ilios = Hisarlęk = Troy. But after reading this article http://www.academia.edu/1858246/Wilusa_Rec...ng_the_Evidence there may be room for some doubt. What do you think? |
![]() |
|
| Todd Feinman | May 11 2015, 06:09 PM Post #2 |
|
Patron
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well that is certainly a convincing paper Hopefully some Luwian inscriptions will be found at Beycesultan.. So difficult to nail anything down with Homer, too.. |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Near Eastern Studies · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



1:00 AM Jul 11