| Welcome to 606 Rebels. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: Wealso allow junior members. |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Sky sports breaking news; no suprise. | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 3rd August 2009 - 04:08 PM (809 Views) | |
| aksattee | 5th August 2009 - 08:58 AM Post #31 |
|
Most well behaved
|
In GeneralI agree with most points here. 1. Yes without Bates I am not sure where LUFC would be today. Don't care if he put any money in it or not. 2. Also agree that Bates is a Buisness Man and wants to see profit at the end of the day. But at the same time I also agree he has an Ego and wants to put 2 fingers up the FA. Again don't care about that as long as it is not at the cost of LUFC. 3. Agree that all sportsmen want to compete at the top of their profession, so Delpd leaving is no surprise at all. It happens all the time and not just at leeds but all clubs below the PL. The only Gripe I have is that All Transfer Fees should be made Public. As soon as the word undisclosed Fee is mentioned. That leaves doubt in peoples mind as to where the money is going. So let FAmake the ruling on this that there should be 100% Transperensy in the Transfer Market. |
![]() |
|
| Bay Rebel | 5th August 2009 - 09:26 AM Post #32 |
|
100% Leeds
|
I'm struggling to follow this now...I think I need to go back to bed...but thanks for clarifying things Matt :blink:
Edited by Bay Rebel, 5th August 2009 - 09:29 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Sir Quej Of Quejdom | 5th August 2009 - 02:39 PM Post #33 |
|
100% Leeds
|
I didnt say they have NEVER been good enough. I said they showed they were good enough 2 seasons ago, but last season the proof shows they werent.
At the risk of repeating myself, this ONLY proves they were good enough THAT SEASON
The manager is part of the team in my view. It is the same as saying "the goalkeeper wasnt good enough but the rest of the team was"
Still to be proved, but I agree with you on this
Agreed |
![]() |
|
| Matt | 5th August 2009 - 03:25 PM Post #34 |
|
Dee's a liar....
|
I know i was being pedantic and it was to wind you up, but you can't say the manager isn't good enough when stats show he was when he was in charge. McAllister was in charge for part so Grayson shouldn't be blamed for his time in charge. Think the point Lee was making was that if Grayson had been in charge we would have probably gone up automatically as the form under his leadership was much better. |
![]() |
|
| Sir Quej Of Quejdom | 5th August 2009 - 06:01 PM Post #35 |
|
100% Leeds
|
I totally agree with everything you said about Grayson. I personally DO think he is good enough and have never said anything to the contrary. the point that Lee was making about "if Grayson had been in charge", I also agree with. I think we could have gone up if he had had the full season. The point I was trying to make was that the ONLY way the team (and that includes the manager) can PROVE they are good enough to go up, is by going up. Having a great 2nd half to a season does not mean you are good enough to go up. If you are good enough to go up, you WILL go up (excepting the -15 season). If you dont go up, you werent good enough, regardless of the excuses (excepting the -15 season again). Saying your good enough to go up despite not going up is the same as saying you are too good to be relegated when you have been relegated. The end of season placings dont lie (again, excepting the -15 season). As I have been saying all through this thread, my personal opinion is that we ARE good enough now. The team now just needs to prove it. |
![]() |
|
| KenDoddsDadsDogsDead | 6th August 2009 - 08:41 AM Post #36 |
|
Have you ever shoed a Horse?
|
BATES OUT Oooops wrong message board. |
![]() |
|
| Rich | 7th August 2009 - 06:38 PM Post #37 |
|
Technically backward twat.
![]()
|
Delph gets his chance at the highest leve, Grayson gets money to spend if he wants (but says there's no rush) and the club get much needed money towards buying back TA. Yeah shit sandwiches all round???????? We're going up this year, you mark my words!!!!!!!!! MOT |
![]() |
|
| 305miles2EllandRd | 8th August 2009 - 12:28 PM Post #38 |
|
Stand up Comedian
|
At the end of the day we have lost our brightest star but if he is going to progress at a PL team he won't get a better chance that at Aston Villa. I would love to see Man Shitty fall on their big spending asses this year and Villa break into the top 4. |
![]() |
|
| Fitz | 15th August 2009 - 07:33 PM Post #39 |
|
Perfectly formed member
![]()
|
Not a good start for Villa.......Fabien must be kicking himself now...... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Rebels Chat · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






3:12 PM Jul 11